Hillary = Underdog or Sweet Polly Purebread.

Tweety = Tweety

Russert = Simon Barsinister

Olbermann = Clark Kent

Well, you do seem to be relishing the idea that this is happening.  Not that that alone qualifies you to work at the RNC, but it does make the mind reel a bit.

Do you really despise Obama that much that this, presuming there is bad fallout from it, brings you glee...?  What if he is the nominee at that time?

Hillary = Underdog or Sweet Polly Purebread.

Tweety = Tweety

Russert = Simon Barsinister

Olbermann = Clark Kent

If Barack is superman then Wright is Kryptonite

if Hillary wins the nomination, I will put aside all differences and work my ass off to beat McLame and make her President.

I only wish some of Hillary's true believers felt the same way.

And guess what, when I lived in New York, I voted for her in 2000.

See Liberals can juggle four or five balls at the same time.

so sure of.  You seem too "nice" to HRC at the moment and that raises a lot of red flags.

We'll see as the next couple of weeks play out.

We've had that for 8 years and this country cannot live with another 4 years of a non-starter.

Obama is a Political Lurker...always in the picture, but never out front, never leading the charge.  Even his "famous" speech resulted in not a single attempt by BO to end the war once he got into the Senate.  But then, he was so busy on day one running for his next promotion he forgot that little issue, didn't he?

I remember reading about him running into committee members on their way to a press conference about something they had just accomplished.  He said, "What's up" and they told him and he said, "Can I come along"?  They said sure - they wanted people on the podium for pictures and then he had the audacity (whoops!) to take the mic and speak as if he had been personally involved in the accomplishment.  Staffers were pissed as hell at what he did.

He lurked in CT in 2006 (never really coming out and supporting Ned Lamont).  He lurks on pro-choice (using weasel words and voting present).  He lurks on race (demanding a dialog and now saying we should all move on - pun intended!).  Condemning the Gas Tax Holiday proposal when he supported other such proposals three times.  

Where in the world does he really stand on things?  I don't know.  And I'm not willing to take a chance.

If we elect a lurker then Repugs will rule the day anyway because he lurks right as much as he lurks left.

NOT what we must have for this country if we are expected to move forward.

Plus, he has destroyed any improvements we have made in race relations since 1960.  

He should be ashamed of himself.

to know.

You have no response?

(I find that often happens when confronted by an Obama supporter...when you provide them with the facts, they disappear.  Crickets!)

So much for "dialog".

Do you ever look at that truth?

your vote is your vote...  I had friends that voted their consciences in 2000 and went with Nader instead of Gore...  I laughed at their buyer's remorse in the following years much as I did the friends who voted for Bush in 2004... Bad politicians are elected by good people that don't vote.  Voting for a third party is similar to not voting since the two major parties have gamed the system to eliminate any serious competition...

But your vote is your vote.